Collusion?
Real case in Taiwan welcoming comments.
There are only two petroleum companies in Taiwan. One is the CPC another is the Formosa (private), the former has 70% market share , 30% the latter. The CPC is a state-owned so if it wants to change oil retail price. The first step is that the CPC should submit suggest price to the Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) waiting for the final decision from the MOEA. Final price is often not equal to suggest price (always lower). Before adjusting price, the CPC will announce to the public by news release in advance. And the Formosa always follows the CPC's final price and early about two hours than the CPC to change its price. Then someone think it is a concerted action between the CPC and the Formosa. That is the CPC pass the information of price change by news release to the Formosa to reach a mutual understanding to change retail price simultaneously. The competition authority in Taiwan, Taiwan FTC also thinks it is a collusion between the CPC and the Formosa. Both of two are fined NT$6.5million respectively.
For the TFTC's decision, someone has different opinions. Is it a correct decision? Hope comments from all of you. Thanks in advance.
2008年1月4日 星期五
訂閱:
張貼留言 (Atom)
如何正確認識SSNIP—兼談問卷調查之應用
凡是涉略過競爭法的朋友對 SSNIP 可說是朗朗上口,但我們對它到底認識了多少 , 而且正確嗎?這就影響了問卷調查的準確與否 。 緣起 SSNIP(Small but Significant and Non-transito...
-
美國司法部反托拉斯署10月16日有關台灣車燈業者認罪協商新聞稿如 http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/press_releases/2012/288041.htm , 中央社17日亦有來自洛杉磯得專電如下: (中央社記者吳協昌洛杉磯2012年1...
-
“ 雙邊市場經濟學論文集:經濟、反托拉斯與策略”(Essays on the Economics of Two-sided Markets:Economics, Antitrust and Strategy)是芝加哥大學法學院David S. Evans教授最近出的 一本新書。...
-
同樣是上游對下游就所供給之商品設定最低轉售價格的行為(RPM),在美國堪薩斯州以「當然違法」視之,可是到了紐約州卻不是如此。同一個約定的行為但卻有兩個不同的情景,孰對?孰錯? 相同的行為不同的判決 堪薩斯州 O`Brien是Leegin皮革公司所生產之Brighton...
沒有留言:
張貼留言