Collusion?
Real case in Taiwan welcoming comments.
There are only two petroleum companies in Taiwan. One is the CPC another is the Formosa (private), the former has 70% market share , 30% the latter. The CPC is a state-owned so if it wants to change oil retail price. The first step is that the CPC should submit suggest price to the Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) waiting for the final decision from the MOEA. Final price is often not equal to suggest price (always lower). Before adjusting price, the CPC will announce to the public by news release in advance. And the Formosa always follows the CPC's final price and early about two hours than the CPC to change its price. Then someone think it is a concerted action between the CPC and the Formosa. That is the CPC pass the information of price change by news release to the Formosa to reach a mutual understanding to change retail price simultaneously. The competition authority in Taiwan, Taiwan FTC also thinks it is a collusion between the CPC and the Formosa. Both of two are fined NT$6.5million respectively.
For the TFTC's decision, someone has different opinions. Is it a correct decision? Hope comments from all of you. Thanks in advance.
2008年1月4日 星期五
訂閱:
張貼留言 (Atom)
評UberEats/foodpanda結合案件決定書
3 月 12 日 UberEats 支付 foodpanda 82 億新台幣分手費的消息 , 佔據當天重要的新聞版面 。 UberEats 與 foodpanda 的結合雖然塵埃落定 , 但 也是評論公平會結合決定書的時候 了 。 緣起 去年的聖誕節...
-
美國司法部反托拉斯署10月16日有關台灣車燈業者認罪協商新聞稿如 http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/press_releases/2012/288041.htm , 中央社17日亦有來自洛杉磯得專電如下: (中央社記者吳協昌洛杉磯2012年1...
-
“ 雙邊市場經濟學論文集:經濟、反托拉斯與策略”(Essays on the Economics of Two-sided Markets:Economics, Antitrust and Strategy)是芝加哥大學法學院David S. Evans教授最近出的 一本新書。...
-
“三個傻瓜”是一部幽默感人的教育歌舞勵志片,對於“唯有讀書高”的觀念表達了不同的見解。而賽局理論中亦有“三個矛盾”,對於廠商的行為有著深刻的描述,並深深的影響競爭法的執法。 小時候,我們都會玩“剪刀-石頭-布” (rock-paper-scissors) 的遊戲,在對手...
沒有留言:
張貼留言